Jack whyte freemason

I liked the philosophical discussion of Christianity and the Templar History. However the action and pace of the book was lacking. Sep 02, Steven Muhlberger rated it it was ok.

I'm not quite sure why I read this book, since I have little patience with big conspiracy novels. I think I was influenced by reviews to see what a successful mass market author could do with the extraordinary real-life history of the Templars. I found the author's knowledge of medieval society sadly lacking. He is capable of writing reasonably clear prose, and that's about it.

Might be a good airport book. So this was supposed to be a kind of Dan Brown-esque historical fiction of the founding of the Knights Templar, beginning with the taking back of Jerusalem in The characters are f A brother of the Order-a medieval secret society uniting noble families in a sacred bond-Sir Hugh de Payens has emerged from the First Crusade a broken man seeking to dedicate his life to God.

In the 12th century. Not to mention Sir Stephen I mean Brother Stephen. He would have been a toddler at the time of the first battle. Keeping in mind that I don't really hold any particular religious views, and have very little "formal" education on the subject aside from a couple of non-western religion classes in college , I do know, from my reading of history, the part the Christian Church has played in the world in the last couple thousand years, as well as those belief systems that came before, and after.

So, I do not know if the entire premise of this story is complete hooey or not. I'm going to assume that Mr. Whyte based this on something somewhat concrete, or one of the more prevalent theories on the Templars' emergence. Just like in the Camulod Chronicles, it was perfectly plausible that as the Romans were pulling out of Britania, some would see the end coming and plan accordingly.

We know the Crusades happened, people from Christendom went to the Holy Land. Now, this particular group, specifically chosen? Sure, why not? So they go to the Holy Land, and so begins the mission inside the mission. I could see, in light of the education the members of the Order receive, the turning away from the violence and mayhem that the other knights took part in.

But I am not entirely sure anyone trained in combat, at that time, from such a young age, would actually have that much issue with it. So again, assuming that conscience is part of that additional education the Order gives, and your average knight does NOT get, then I can see the progression to the creation of Warrior Monks.

It seemed to be relatively politic-free, but maybe more comes as the story progresses in the next books; maybe I am biased because everything today is tinged with politics? Overall, once I made the decision to go along with a couple of the main premises, I really enjoyed the story, and look forward to the next book in the series.

This first book wasn't quite as fleshed out as The Skystone, I didn't quite get the same kind of visuals from it, but again, that might be my prejudices, having been to England and not Jerusalem. I thought that maybe the Princess's storyline was a bit over the top, and in the end, a bit superfluous, but maybe St Clair couldn't get where he was going any other way.

Don't know. I will be curious to see how the next book carries on the story, maybe putting a few of the things in this first one in better light?

An intriguing story, good character development, even if not of the same caliber as Camulod - or maybe it requires the same investment as Camulod to feel that way? One thing that bugged me throughout the book, though, was the phrase "even although" - isn't that redundant?

I hope that was just some poor editing, or maybe a local dialect thing that I've just never run across; it jumped off the page and hurt my brain every time I read it Returning for another series from the excellent Jack Whyte-who is fast becoming one of my favourite authors.

I've been surprised to read that so many have not enjoyed this series. Granted it doesn't have the colour and excitement of the "Camulod" series, but that in itself is not enough to dismiss it out of hand.

Whyte writes beautifully:long, descriptive sentences and paragraphs which are full of interest and fact, so we gain on various counts. For this alone I fail to see why he is being criti Returning for another series from the excellent Jack Whyte-who is fast becoming one of my favourite authors. For this alone I fail to see why he is being criticised:he is clearaly knowledgeable and passionate about his subject, which he appears to have resesarched well, and which he is keen to share with his audience-and for this I think he should be commended.

Granted, it makes the resultant book rather lengthy-especcially the first or so pages-but the reader could skim read, if necessary. The first in the Templar series concerns the finding of the underground vaults and " treasure", introducing the main characters, from both sides. There is not a huge amount of epic action-but what there is is done well, and at times the novel becomes a truly page turning work of renown.

Moral, theological, political and historical ideas are examined at length, and introduced into the releveant characters's lives, which give them added potency. The search to unearth the truth behind The Temple on the Mount thus begins well and sets the reader up for a hopefully interesting denouement in the following books in the series. Hugh de Payens is perhaps the leading, central character throughout, and I am certainly hoping that we will be learning more about him-although as he is one of the older ie in his 50s!

I certainly recommend this highly-not only to those who are interested in this period of history-but also to those who just want to read an exciting but well reserached novel. Another success from Whyte's pen. I'm not very far in, less than pages, and I don't think I will invest much more time in it. It exhibits a sense of showing versus telling, but it's not blatantly bad - it didn't make me cringe or want to throw it in my woodstove.

It's air smells of tell and underlying uncomfortableness. I felt the voice was wrong. I picked it up and set it down many times over the last couple of days -- read it during breaks in the Oscars -- and several times I was thrown off by the thrid person as I expected I'm not very far in, less than pages, and I don't think I will invest much more time in it.

I picked it up and set it down many times over the last couple of days -- read it during breaks in the Oscars -- and several times I was thrown off by the thrid person as I expected a first person voice.

I've never had that happen to me before. I'm not sure what it means; I can only assume the voice was mis-written. Some of the words were too big and many of the ideas too small. I felt some empathy for the characters, but I'm not drawn in enough. There's too much fluffy detail and not enough poignant character tension. I do want to know what happens next, but I'm not sure I want to wade through the bog to discover it.

After reading the Dream of Eagles series, I was very eager to try another of Whyte's historical epic series. I do like Whyte's manner of storytelling, I find I sail on through his chapters, swept up in the language and the tale he weaves. I didn't get so attached to the characters in this set, as they change more often than in the other.

But, as a fan of Whyte, I can After reading the Dream of Eagles series, I was very eager to try another of Whyte's historical epic series. But, as a fan of Whyte, I cannot say that I won't wait to see what magic he produces next. Fortunately, I still have the third in this series to read ahead of me.

Oct 20, Mindi rated it it was amazing. I really enjoyed this book. I had a very hard time putting it down. It was well written and the characters were described well and while I read it I felt like I was there watching. It made me really think about the different religions and how they are very much alike in the most basic ways. I would highly recommend this book. Especially if you enjoy period books.

I can't wait to read the next two in the trilogy. If you decide to read this book I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. It was well-written, if very masculine. Which is to be expected in a story about warrior monks, but it is a departure from my normal reading habits. I'd like to read his Camlaud series and see how that works. This was the first book by Jack Whyte that I picked up.

It was a bit hard to get into, but once I got past a a hundred or so pages, I started to really enjoy it. Jack has a great way of story telling; highly detailed. Some readers might find it a bit dry though. After finishing this book, I immediately picked up the second of the trilogy.

Quality read - enjoyed the book cover to cover. It's hard to find a book that does not portray the Templars as an evil entity.

Jack Whyte borrows a bit from Masonic ritual which I think is a it out there, but let's be realistic - it's fiction! Jul 19, L. I could only make it a few pages before giving up. I'd wanted to read this for years, but began losing interest almost immediatly. Great story using the history of the Templars!

Definitely a page turner! Mar 17, Stephen rated it it was amazing. This is a great piece of historical fiction. It centers on Hugh de Payen and the formation of the Templar Knights. This is the first of Jack Whyte's awesome Templar Trilogy. Arthurian legends are one of my favorite topics to read. The series combined some of the myths as well as some factual information. I really enjoyed reading those books. The combination of truth and fiction is another attention getting device to which I am addicted.

Recently, my local public library drew my attention to Mr. I do not remember when I became a fan of this historic and controversial group but it was 50 or more years ago. We'd never been to a restaurant in England because we met in Australia.

Blogger Roxie is said to have dated Jack even before his long-term relationship with Gemma Chan. Jack and met actress Gemma Chan on the set of Fresh Meat in and the pair hit it off straight away — embarking on a six-year relationship.

Sadly, the pair called in quits in when Gemma, 36, moved out of the comedian's Notting Hill flat. The couple had been finding it increasingly difficult to spend time together as their schedules became busier and busier, but the two remain good friends.

Jack first presented the Brit Awards in February and it was reported that he got very close to singer Dua Lipa. The two were spotted kissing at an awards show after-party and Jack is said to have had a huge crush on the year-old New Rules singer.

Jack and Dua were seen holding hands at the party, held at London's Freemasons' Hall, in pictures published by The Sun. However rumours died down shortly afterwards, and the two haven't been snapped together since.

Kirsty and Jack have known each other for years and both appeared on A League of Their Ow n and rumours that the pair were romantically involved started in April after Jack and year-old Kirsty were seen flirting at a party. Onlookers saw serious chemistry between the co-workers when they partied alongside other stars at London's Groucho Club before moving on to a friend's flat in the earlier hours.

Book digitized by Google from the library of the University of Michigan and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. Or Illustrations of Masonry Item Preview remove circle Publication date The Freemason s monitor, or, Illustrations of Masonry Are you sure you want to remove The Freemason s monitor, or, Illustrations of Masonry from your list?

Carroll co. If he's not one of them, he sure loves playing into their game. I certainly think he knows what he's doing. But you can't argue with success, right? Well the entertainment business is an Illuminati cash cow. Perhaps why Lyne called the Kennedy as pat of the Illuminati.

So JB is influenced by and working for the Illuminati but in close enough to touch them, I don't think so. Now the Space program is Illuminati controlled.

But doesn't make them a bad person or know the Illuminati they just work for the Big Lie or part of it. Hey good question. Did JB ever mention the Illuminati. Perhaps when he retires reading the Lyne revelations might be amusing but not now. Don't forget weather we went to the Moon or not JFK said we should go there. A big scientific decision or a big lie. I don't know, but I highly doubt Jack Black is a member or agent willingly or not of the Illuminati.

One would also need to prove the existence and relevance of such a massive, all-encompassing organization in order to offer up its membership. However, I feel confident he would take great delight in this thread. Perhaps he would be inspired to create a movie where he tackles these accusations. It would be very meta to make a movie about himself being contemplated as Illuminati, especially if he, indeed, is.

Maybe that's the plan. Yes he is. Everyone is, even the mail man.